HOME | CONTACT US |  SITE MAP   
Enjoy fellowship at Mount Vernon Unitarian Church  

Kitchen renovation completed; other improvements planned

The first of three projects for improving the Meeting House -- renovation of  the kitchen -- has now been completed (except for the usual minor touch-ups). Members and friends are thrilled with the space-saving pocket doors, the shiny countertops, the beautiful cabinets, and the new window overlooking the patio. The installation of trim and painting are almost finished. The project was overseen by Wendy Burns and Tamara de la Camp.
   The two other projects approved at a congregational meeting January 22 are tentatively scheduled to begin in January 2013. One is construction of a new platform and related choir risers in the Chapel, headed by Jeanne Gayler. The other, extension and remodeling of the Commons, headed by Doug MacCleery, requires additional planning and approvals from Fairfax County. The application for a "minor modification" has been submitted to Fairfax County officials. 
   Funding for the combined set of projects is completely separate from the annual operating budget. The remodeling is paid for with money contributed by members and friends to the 2004 capital campaign. Although the total cost is somewhat less than the total needed, the Board expects that additional funds, sufficient to complete the projects, will become available from members who have not yet paid all of their pledges from that campaign. 
   To get involved in the planning, contact Al Robbert, aarobbert@comcast.net, 703-299-9892. 

 Expansion and Remodeling of the Commons

 Doug MacCleery  & Ron Brandt                                                                                                                 

What the project includes

·         Enlarging the Commons by moving the entrance and surrounding window-walls about 25 feet closer to the parking lot.

·         New carpeting.

·         A different interior roof treatment to improve acoustics.

·         Installation of sprinklers for fire protection (explained below). 

Why this is needed

Beginning with surveys conducted by the Long-Range Planning Committee in the 1990s, church members consistently named the crowded, noisy Commons as highest priority for improvement. Accordingly, the plan developed by architects Cole & Denny included an expanded Commons. The current proposal, adapted by the architects from their original design, calls for the Commons to be approximately as shown in that 2006 plan. Because the more elaborate new entrance shown in that plan will not be built at this time, the current proposal calls for an entrance similar in size to the present one but this time with an added roofline consistent with design of the existing wings.

What will be done

A drawing showing the approximate floor plan of the enlarged Commons is shown on the next page.  The design would expand the Commons floor area by 60-70% from about 990 sq. ft. to about 1650 sq. ft.  With new carpeting throughout and with acoustical treatment of the ceiling, it will be a quieter, more attractive space for meetings and social activities, especially the social time before and after Sunday services.

Sprinklers

In fall 2007 we were informed that if we were to proceed with our remodeling project we would have to install sprinklers throughout the entire building. The ruling was issued by the office of the Fairfax County Fire Marshall because of low water pressure and water flow on the hill. If we now proceed with this much smaller project, we will request a waiver of the ruling with the provision that we will install sprinklers only in the Commons (both the new and old sections).

Estimated cost

A very rough estimated cost for the Commons extension is $400,000.  If we are unable to obtain a waiver of the sprinklering requirement, the costs could increase substantially (by perhaps $50,000 or more). 
   A presentation with conceptual drawings is available here.

                                      

NEW PLATFORM & CHOIR LOFT

(See conceptual model, drawing, designer’s notes)

Purpose:  To redress deficiencies of current stage by improving the following 12 components

-          Safety                                                           - Disability access                                            - Storage

-          Acoustics                                                     - Lighting                                                             - Air flow

-          Deficit of use                                             - Integration of all elements                      - Adaptability

-          Mobility for speakers                            - Accessibility                                                    - Attractiveness

·         Safety  – Build a solid new stage devoid of instability and squeakiness. Install guard rails at both ends of stage for safety. Build wider steps all along front of stage for safety.

·         Acoustics – Construct a backdrop of wooden arches to match existing ones, creating a band- shell effect that reflects and projects sound toward congregation.

·         Deficit of use – Enlarge present 12’ stage to 39’ wide and deepen new stage from 8’ to 16’, providing ample space for plays, bands, weddings, holiday activities, etc.

·         Mobility of speakers – Enlarged stage allows speakers to move around rather than be immobilized.

·         Disability access – Provide assist-ramp for disabled. (Optional: increases cost.)

·         Lighting – Already the Aesthetics Committee in partnership with the Property Committee has more than doubled the brightness of the chapel with a new system of perimeter lighting. Importantly, the newly installed dimmers provide lighting control for dinners, dances, presentations, etc.  The stage itself will be backlit for dramatic effect.

·         Integration of all elements – All components would be combined into a holistic panorama: 25-30 choir members, the minister, lectern, chalice, flowers, speakers and stage furnishings. Another dividend of the double steps allows the children to sit on the wide steps during story time, thereby becoming part of the tableau.

·         Accessibility to stage – Presently we have a single narrow set of stairs to access stage. The new wide, double steps allow for 39 feet of access to stage, all along the front.

·         Storage – The new curved design of the stage allows for storage of chairs behind both ends.

·         Air flow – Currently the two draperies cover the registers. We propose to extend the ducts underneath the stage, to the front of stage for increased air flow.

·         Adaptability – The new stage is designed with a removable third choir tier to create a flat stage when needed.

·         Attractiveness – Essentially we could all enjoy a more commodious, comfortable, professional and attractive setting for a multitude of activities – one vision, rather than a patchwork of visuals. And safer.

Statistics

-          Scale of model: one inch equals 2 feet

-          Width of new stage is 39 feet wide and 16 feet deep at widest end.  Height is 2 feet.

-          Congregational seating is unchanged

-          The stage is designed to be permanent. It was originally designed to be moveable, but those who have labored with the present stage advise that the heavy lifting and disentanglement of electric wires and cables, moving sound equipment, then reassembling same is not worth the effort.

 Respectfully submitted,  Jeanne Gayler

Background

In the fall of 2004, MVUC conducted a capital campaign that produced commitments of about $1,280,000, of which over $1,000,000 has been collected. In 2006 the congregation approved plans for an addition to the Meeting House and other improvements. The construction approved in 2006 (substantially reduced from the more comprehensive design that had been the basis for the capital campaign) included a greatly expanded commons, a new entryway with larger cloakrooms, a new nursery, and renovated offices, kitchen, and restrooms. In accord with the motion passed by the Congregation, over half of the Building Fund was used for renovation of Hollin Hall and other expenses, including fees for preparation of construction documents and County approvals. The remaining $468,000 is invested pending further action. In 2007 the Board realized that our budget could not be stretched to cover debt service on the required mortgage. Accordingly, the building project was put on hold.    
   In 2009 several congregational meetings were held to explore the feasibility of restarting the building process. It was decided then that we should have at least two very successful stewardship campaigns before we could consider restarting the process. Unfortunately, while we got good results in the spring 2010 stewardship campaign, falling wedding revenues due to the economic recession created an unexpected hole in our budget. The fall 2010 Revisit Campaign filled that hole, but did not provide enough of a cushion to allow us to take on debt service at that time. 
  
At the Congregational Meeting in May 2011, members indicated in a straw poll that, rather than further postponing the full building program approved in 2006, we should consider three smaller-scale improvement projects: extension and remodeling of the Commons, renovation of the Kitchen, and construction of a new stage in the Chapel. These projects would achieve several aspects of the more extensive building plans without incurring a large debt.  If approved at the January 22 meeting, remodeling of the Commons is scheduled to begin a year later in January 2013.

 

Financing

MVUC is facing a deficit in our operating budget, primarily due to slump in rental income. Although this is serious, the Building Fund cannot and should not be used to offset operating budget deficits. That would break faith with those who contributed to the Building Fund in the 2004 campaign and are expecting the money to be used for that purpose.

 

Stage                                                                 54,000

Kitchen                                                              67,000

Commons                                                        400,000

Sprinklers (worst case)                                     50,000

                         Total                                     $571,000

 

Cash on hand in Building Fund                       468,000

Balance remaining on pledges                         170,000

                        Total                                         $638,000